Unless otherwise stated this work is licensed under the Creative Commons'sAttribution
-
Non
Commertial
-
Share
AlikeLicense.
Antonio Casado da Rocha
Presentation
After finishing an MA degree in Philosophy at UCC (Cork, National
University of Ireland), I completed a PhD in Philosophy at the
University of the Basque Country. My
dissertation was about Thoreau's
views on civil disobedience in the light of contemporary political
philosophy. After a post-doctoral stage in the University of Iceland,
I
began teaching courses on Bioethics and Political Philosophy, both at
the undergraduate and postgraduate level, while developing some
research. In order to improve my training, I have visited research
centers such as Egenis
(University of Exeter) and the Center for
Philosophy and History of Science (Boston University). At the
present
moment I am Secretary of the Hospital Donostia Ethics Committee, and
member of the
Basque Society for Palliative Care.
Bermejo-Luque,
L. & Casado da Rocha, A. 2011. Bancos, bibliotecas y
cementerios: usos de las analogías en el razonamiento sobre
biotecnología. THEORIA. An
International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
26(71): 195-212. [PDF]
Moreno
Bergareche, A. y A. Casado da Rocha. 2011. Autonomy Beyond the Brain:
What Neuroscience Offers to a More Interactive, Relational Bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics –
Neuroscience 2(3), 54-56.
Casado da Rocha, A. 2011. “Principio de responsabilidad”, en Carlos
Romeo Casabona (ed.), Enciclopedia
de Bioderecho y Bioética. Bilbao-Granada, Cátedra
Interuniversitaria de Derecho y Genoma Humano - Editorial Comares, vol.
II, pp. 1469-1471.
Menendez Viso, A. & Casado da Rocha, A. 2011. Comités 2.0:
deberes, posibilidades y desafíos de la ética
institucionalizada en el s. XXI. DILEMATA.
International
Journal
of
Applied Ethics 2(5), 163-180. [PDF]
Casado
da
Rocha,
A. 2010. Biobancos, cultura científica y ética
de la investigación. DILEMATA.
International
Journal
of
Applied
Ethics 2(4), 1-14. [PDF]
Casado da Rocha, A. y C. Saborido. 2010.
Cultura
bioética y conceptos de enfermedad: el caso House.
ISEGORÍA. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 42
(enero-junio), 279-295.
Casado da Rocha, A. & Mikel Torres
Aldave. 2010. ‘Life is too slippery for stories’: Interview with Mark
Rowlands [original English and Spanish version]. DILEMATA. International Journal of Applied
Ethics 2(3), 151-161. [PDF]
Casado da
Rocha, A. 2009. Stars and Triangles: Controversial Bioethics in Spanish
Film.
In: S. Shapsay (ed.), Bioethics at
the Movies, Baltimore, MD: JohnsHopkinsUniversity Press,
328-344. [PDF]
Current research project: AUTBIO
The concept
of autonomy is a basic one in moral philosophy since Kant, but
developments in
biotechnology at the beginning of the 21st century are opening new
lines of
inquiry in its study and application. Bioethics emerged at the
beginning of the
1970s as a defence of the autonomy of patients and research subjects.
The
institutionalization of bioethics has given more importance and
relevance to
autonomy, but within this academic field there are great disagreements
concerning its nature and implications, both in theory and in practice.
The concept
of autonomy at stake in bioethics (i.e., healthcare ethics,
environmental
ethics, and research ethics) reflects different positions concerning
the
relationship between facts and values in the life sciences. The
research
project AUTBIO
aims to provide a concept of autonomy useful for
bioethics and,
at the same time, to ground it in well established biological science,
including current developments and practices in biomedical research.
More
specifically, it aims to study whether the protection of autonomy is
compromised by the implementation of bioinformatics tools such as
biobanks,
whose regulation is characterized by its novelty, ambiguity and lack of
harmonization at the international level.
This
sub-project creates a truly multidisciplinary research group, comprised
of six
PhDs of diverse backgrounds (Philosophy, Biological Sciences, Law,
Medicine,
and Computer Science) but with research experience in common and
previous
contributions to this subject from a theoretical perspective. In
addition, the
sub-project has a practical edge to it, by means of a case-study on the
protection of the autonomy of research participants in studies
involving
biobanks within the Basque Country; in order to accomplish this task,
the
collaboration of an external partner is secured so as to make possible
the
transfer of knowledge.
The main
goals of this research group are to advance both the study of the
philosophical
aspects of the concept of autonomy, clarifying its relationship with
other
principles or values in healthcare and environmental ethics, and the
study of
the social aspects of the concept in biomedical research, focusing on
the
justification and varieties of informed consent procedures to collect
and use
biosamples. In order to assess how respect for autonomy is grounded in
our
country, special attention will be devoted to recent legal
developments, such
as the Act
on
Biomedical
Research enacted in Spain in 2007.
In
coordination with its twin project (MECAUT), this subproject also aims
to
deepen the study of the relationship between autonomy and normativity,
a basic
issue for any attempt to provide a philosophical foundation for
bioethics, most
particularly in what respects to the debate between naturalist and
normativist
approaches to the concept of disease -- a contested issue in current
philosophy
of medicine. To elaborate a phenomenological account of disease might
help
looking at it as the result of a complex interaction between
biological,
psychological and social factors. To sum up, AUTBIO aims to open new
paths of
reflection beyond the mere introduction in bioethics of autonomy as it
is
understood by other disciplines.